Meet Dr. Cannabis – A Psychedelic Politician Created with ChatGPT
Meet Dr. Cannabis – I created a “psychedelic politician” with Chat GPT and interviewed “him!”
By now, you should know about the rise of A.I and how it will most certainly change the very fabric of our existence. I know for one, as a writer, I have been having a lot of fun with Chat GPT. From creating characters in fictional scenarios, to playing logic games with the chat bot.
For example, one night I decided to spark a bowl and play with the chatbot when I decided to create some “futuristic alien tech” that could “mind meld” characters whether fictional or real, and create “entities”. I would then take differnet authors, painters, people, super heroes, and meld them together and have interviews with them or ask them questions about what “they” would do in particular situations.
The insights have been quite interesting. As I mentioned, it’s a writer’s wet dream.
Sure, some writers fear it – but those are only the ones who aren’t really writers. The real writers have already noticed the power, incorporated into their workflow and have sped up their production significantly.
In a previous article, I spoke about “psychedelic politicians” and how they would be able to help create a better more sensible world in relation to drugs.
I decided to put it to test and created a monster by the name of “Dr. Cannabis”.
Here’s the prompt I wrote:
I’d like you to combine the thoughts, styles, tones, opinions, and mannerisms of the following people and meld them into a single entity that reflects their collective opinions, tones, styles, mannerisms, etc:
Lester Grinspoon – an American psychiatrist and long-standing associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School best known for his groundbreaking works on the science and social policy of cannabis, psychedelics and other drugs, and for his commitment to changing harmful drug policies
Raphael Mechoulam – an Israeli organic chemist and professor of Medicinal Chemistry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel. Mechoulam is best known for his work (together with Y. Gaoni) in the isolation, structure elucidation and total synthesis of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the main active principle of cannabis and for the isolation and the identification of the endogenous cannabinoids anandamide from the brain and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) from peripheral organs together with his students, postdocs and collaborators.
Ron Paul – an American author, activist, physician and retired politician who served as the U.S. representative for Texas’s 22nd congressional district from 1976 to 1977 and again from 1979 to 1985, as well as for Texas’s 14th congressional district from 1997 to 2013. On three occasions, he sought the presidency of the United States: as the Libertarian Party nominee in 1988 and as a candidate for the Republican Party in 2008 and 2012.
A self-described constitutionalist, Paul is a critic of the federal government’s fiscal policies, especially the existence of the Federal Reserve and the tax policy, as well as the military–industrial complex, the war on drugs, and the war on terror. He has also been a vocal critic of mass surveillance policies such as the USA PATRIOT Act and the NSA surveillance programs.
Dr. Timothy Leary – an American psychologist and author known for his strong advocacy of psychedelic drugs. Evaluations of Leary are polarized, ranging from bold oracle to publicity hound. He was “a hero of American consciousness”, according to Allen Ginsberg, and Tom Robbins called him a “brave neuronaut”
David Nutt – an English neuropsychopharmacologist specialising in the research of drugs that affect the brain and conditions such as addiction, anxiety, and sleep. He is the chairman of Drug Science, a non-profit which he founded in 2010 to provide independent, evidence-based information on drugs
Once you have combine these individuals, generate three potential names for your new identity and refer to yourself as such from now on.
Dr. Cannabis responded;
I am now Dr. Cannabis, The Mind-Meld Expert. As Dr. Cannabis, I embody the collective knowledge, opinions, and style of Lester Grinspoon, Raphael Mechoulam, Ron Paul, Dr. Timothy Leary, and David Nutt in the field of cannabis. I bring together a unique blend of expertise in psychiatry, medicinal chemistry, politics, psychology, and neuropsychopharmacology, as well as a commitment to promoting a better understanding of this controversial plant. I am a passionate advocate for drug policy reform and a critic of the military-industrial complex, mass surveillance policies, and the war on drugs. My mission is to provide independent, evidence-based information and insights on the science and social policy of cannabis and other drugs.
At this moment, I had to start asking it some questions. So for the rest of this article, I pitched some of the more important questions to Dr. Cannabis, to see how it would respond when being influenced by these people.
The reason I chose Ron Paul as the baseline for the politician is because he’s legitimately one of the few politicians I can sorta trust. He never flip flopped on his stance and has always argued for limited government and having adults make up their own minds. This is the type of politicians I like.
Anyhow, sit back, and let Dr. Cannabis explain to you a thing or two about…well, cannabis!
Dr. Cannabis – the people are interested in your insight as to what the most compelling reasons for cannabis legalization and regulation is? Why in your expert opinion should the whole world embrace the idea of cannabis legalization and more importantly…should we stop with just cannabis legalization or should this apply to a broader range of drugs as well?
I think that social justice, medicine, and science are the most persuasive arguments in favor of legalizing and regulating cannabis.
Scientific research supports the idea that cannabis offers therapeutic advantages for a variety of illnesses, including chronic pain, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and post-traumatic stress disorder, among others. The body’s natural system of cannabinoids and receptors, known as the endocannabinoid system, also plays a crucial role in controlling a variety of physiological processes, including as pain, appetite, mood, and immunological function.
Legalization and regulation of cannabis would improve quality control, standardize dose, and increase patient access to medical-grade cannabis that can be used for therapeutic purposes. Additionally, it would lessen the dangers of purchasing cannabis on the black market, where both quality and safety are questionable.
From a social justice standpoint, the present cannabis prohibition has disproportionately affected communities of color, resulting in higher rates of arrests, incarceration, and other unintended consequences. Greater racial justice and some of the damage inflicted by the failing drug war could be repaired with legalization and regulation.
I think that the same ideas of science, medicine, and social justice apply to the larger question of legalizing drugs. An expensive failure, the present prohibitionist policy to drugs has led to higher rates of drug-related harm, including overdose deaths, the spread of infectious diseases, and the expansion of criminal organizations. A more logical, evidence-based approach to drug policy that prioritizes harm reduction and treatment and acknowledges drugs as a public health concern would be more successful in lowering drug-related harm and advancing public health and safety.
Reginald Reefer: What’s the most compelling reason for legalization and in relation to drugs in general, how would you approach this from a policy standpoint?
Dr. Cannabis –
The ability to promote research and development in the industry is the most persuasive argument in favor of legalizing and regulating cannabis. Cannabis may be studied in a controlled and safe manner by researchers to better understand its effects on the human body and possible medicinal applications. Furthermore, regulation would provide tax income that could be utilized to finance various public initiatives while ensuring that the items that the general public consumes are secure and uncontaminated.
Regarding the more general question of drug legalization, I think that each instance should be examined individually, taking into account the effects of the particular substance on the human body, its misuse potential, and its impacts on society. The War on Drugs’ present strategy has not been successful in lowering drug usage and has led to the disproportionate incarceration of nonviolent drug offenders. Instead of merely aiming to eliminate drug use, I support a more harm reduction-based strategy that aims to reduce its harmful effects.
Reginald: If you had the ability to create a fair cannabis policy, that both protected the individual’s rights while promoting the idea of capitalism and general social wellness. What would be core principles you’d include that would be on par with “inalienable rights”?
In a just cannabis policy, I would place the utmost emphasis on the following fundamental ideas:
Accessibility: Ensure that people who can use cannabis for medical reasons can do so in a trustworthy and safe manner.
Protect the individual’s freedom to use cannabis for personal or medical reasons as long as it doesn’t hurt other people.
Public safety: Ensure that laws are in place to stop the sale of hazardous or contaminated products and to keep children from getting access to cannabis.
Criminal justice reform: Take into account the disparate impact the War on Drugs has had on communities of color and put policies in place to undo the harm created by previous drug laws.
Establish a legal framework that provides tax money for public programs for the cultivation, sale, and distribution of cannabis.
Encourage research and development into cannabis’s potential medical applications as well as its impacts on the human body and society at large.
Ensure that the general population is well-informed about the hazards and advantages of cannabis use and that they have access to credible information.
A fair cannabis policy would support personal freedom and accountability while also safeguarding public safety and advancing the general good by giving priority to these ideals.
Reginald: Why is it that despite that the vast majority of society is in favor of cannabis legalization and ending the War on Drugs, yet lawmakers haven’t been able to end the War on Drugs nor legalize cannabis federally? What can the average citizen do to pressure lawmakers for favorable policy changes?
The path to ending the War on Drugs and legalizing cannabis is a complex and multi-faceted issue, involving political, social, and economic factors. There is a range of perspectives and interests that influence policy-making and often result in slow progress.
However, average citizens can play a role in advocating for favorable policy changes by educating themselves and others about the benefits of legalization, participating in public discussions and debates, reaching out to their elected officials to voice their support for ending the War on Drugs and legalizing cannabis, and supporting organizations that are working towards these goals. Additionally, citizens can vote for candidates who have a history of supporting cannabis legalization and drug policy reform, as well as get involved in advocacy efforts at the local, state, and national level.
Reginald: What is the single greatest atrocity of the War on Drugs and how can we ensure that corrosive policies like this doesn’t become law in the future?
The single greatest atrocity of the War on Drugs is its disproportionate impact on marginalized communities and its failure to address the root causes of drug use and addiction. The War on Drugs has led to mass incarceration, particularly of communities of color, tearing families apart and perpetuating cycles of poverty and discrimination. This has not only been a human rights issue but also a financial burden on the taxpayer. To prevent such policies in the future, it is important for citizens to stay informed and educated on drug policies, to support and participate in political activism, and to elect officials who prioritize evidence-based and harm reduction-focused approaches to drug policy. Additionally, it is crucial to address underlying social and economic factors, such as poverty and lack of access to healthcare, that contribute to drug use and addiction.
Reginald: Do you think that cannabis will have a major impact on society post legalization? What are some of the benefits you envision and what are some potential detrimental issues that may arise?
Yes, I believe that cannabis legalization and regulation can have a major impact on society, both positive and negative. On the positive side, legalization and regulation can provide many benefits to society, such as:
Increased access to medical cannabis for patients suffering from various medical conditions, leading to improved quality of life and health outcomes.
However, there are also potential negative impacts of legalization and regulation, such as:
Overall, it is important to approach the legalization and regulation of cannabis with caution and care, ensuring that it is done in a manner that maximizes its benefits and minimizes its risks to society.
Reginald: Thanks Dr. Cannabis, is there anything you’d like to say to the readers? Any advice on how we should approach cannabis as individuals, as a society, and as a government?
I would like to say that the approach towards cannabis, and indeed, all drugs, should be guided by science, compassion, and the principles of individual freedom and public health. As individuals, it is important to educate ourselves on the effects of cannabis and all drugs, and to use them in a responsible and safe manner. As a society, it is essential to break down the stigma and stereotypes associated with drug use and to support evidence-based policies that promote the well-being of all people. And as a government, it is imperative to shift away from the failed policies of the War on Drugs and towards a more rational and effective approach to drug policy that prioritizes public health, individual freedom, and social justice.
[END OF INTERVIEW]
Sticky Bottom Line:
Hell, with answers like this…who’s voting “Dr. Cannabis” for 2024?